She was the "Queen of Hearts".
He was the "King of Pop".
The titles may have been honorific, but the global media attention on Michael Jackson and Princess Diana was fit for royalty.
On Tuesday July 7th, the world will watch as the greatest pop star of all time is laid to rest with a televised memorial service at Los Angeles' Staples Center. 1 million people are expected to converge on the city to witness the services, even though it is unlikely they will see anything important. A similar number was assigned to the people who lined the route to Westminster Abbey in 1997, watching in sadness as Britain's fallen princess passed by in a Royal Standard-covered coffin.
Jackson's farewell will most likely be a global watershed event, much like Diana's. In a twisted way, it makes sense that these two public figures have similar impacts at their deaths. There had never been two people like them before, and considering the current crop of A-list celebrities, there may never be again. Michael and Diana lived two completely different lives, but they were arguably the two most visible people on the planet. People Magazine has dedicated nearly 50 covers to Diana, from her engagement to Prince Charles to her fatal car accident in Paris. It is unlikely that a country exists without one person that owns a copy of Thriller. The world was fascinated by their every move, good and bad, and proceeded to film and write about them for a collective three decades. Their deaths haven't slowed the fascination at all; in some cases, it intensified it.
So, why all of the attention on these two people? Why did the passing of an ex-wife of a British prince call into the question the relevance of the monarchy? How is it possible for a singer to continue to dominate television, print, and radio, two weeks into his death?
Because, in life, no one else quite understood the power of the media like them. Michael, with his music, style, and eccentric behavior, and Diana, with her beauty, charity, and her calculated understanding of image, used newspapers, magazines, and television to elevate themselves to iconic status. If the media was a kingdom, they were the undisputed king and queen. Their shared tragedy is that the media staged a coup d'etat of epic proportions. Through hurtful and stressful headlines and obsessive paparazzi stalking their every move, the media who once ate out of their palms, took control of their images. As we've seen, the results were unprecedented, and ultimately tragic.
Diana and Michael are unique because they both reached their peak as the world began to shift to a celebrity-dominated mass media culture. With the advent of cable and the booming success of tabloids, public figures were placed under a microscope to be dissected at a molecular level.
In the 80's, just as the obsession with celebrity reached a new height, Michael Jackson and Princess Diana emerged as global forces to be reckoned with. Michael, with his album Thriller sitting atop the charts for a mind-boggling 37 weeks, was the biggest pop star in the world. His music videos turned MTV into a cultural touchstone. His dancing, particularly the moonwalk, were desperately practiced by the masses. His style, including the red leather jacket and the sequined glove, were must-haves. Diana, the gorgeous young wife of Prince Charles, had captured the imagination of not just the UK, but the whole world. Her beauty, style, and charity work easily stole headlines from the other royals, especially her husband. The popular divide had grown so large, that people on one side of the street booed when Diana chose the other side to chat with and they were stuck with Charles.
In the 80's, just as the obsession with celebrity reached a new height, Michael Jackson and Princess Diana emerged as global forces to be reckoned with. Michael, with his album Thriller sitting atop the charts for a mind-boggling 37 weeks, was the biggest pop star in the world. His music videos turned MTV into a cultural touchstone. His dancing, particularly the moonwalk, were desperately practiced by the masses. His style, including the red leather jacket and the sequined glove, were must-haves. Diana, the gorgeous young wife of Prince Charles, had captured the imagination of not just the UK, but the whole world. Her beauty, style, and charity work easily stole headlines from the other royals, especially her husband. The popular divide had grown so large, that people on one side of the street booed when Diana chose the other side to chat with and they were stuck with Charles.
Diana also wanted to create an image. She was terribly unhappy in her marriage to Prince Charles, who had returned to his mistress Camilla Parker-Bowles. In the beginning, she had virtually no power and support from the other members of the family was lacking at best. What she did have was the adoration of both the public and the press, who benefitted greatly from her image on their covers. From there, Diana began to use the media to work in her advantage. The cameras that followed her inadvertently promoted low-profile issues like homelessness and AIDS, an illness she was credited for single-handedly erasing the stigma from. She used them to upstage and undercut her husband. Powerful images of solidarity, like her alone in front of the Taj Mahal and her pulling away from Charles' kiss at a polo match, were beamed all over the world. The press painted her as a suffering champion for the people and him as a dim, philandering cad unfit to reign.
In Part 2, Diana and Michael see their lives change forever as their efforts to control the media fail miserably, ultimately resulting in their tragic ends.
1 comment:
This is very well done.
Post a Comment